Adjunct to Nonsurgical Treatment of Periodontal Disease
Keywords:
laser,
treatment,
medical, Time:25-11-2015
1. Introduction
The biofilms adhered on the internal and external walls of the periodontal pocket, the free
biofilm and the possibility of a bacterial penetration through the epithelium to the underlying
connective tissue can cause a gingival inflammatory reaction. This inflammation may progress
with vasodilation, cellular migration and release of mediators, thus increasing the inflammatory
response and perpetuating the disease. This situation makes microorganisms more resistant to
drugs, which frequently are unable to reach the colonies protected by the matrix and by the
presence of resistent bacteria (Donlan & Costerton, 2002). The inflammatory phenomena
triggered by the bacteria and their waste products attracts macrophages that produce, among
others, interleukin 1 (IL-1) and tumor necrosis factor alfa (TNF-┙), which have the ability to
activate osteoclasts and produce bone resorption. TNF-┙ activates the adhesion molecules of the
endothelial cells of the vessels, favouring the adhesion of monocytes and diapedesis. It also
stimulates the arrival of T lymphocytes, which contribute with receptor activator of nuclear
factor kappa B ligand (RANKL) to the bone, consequently favouring the bone loss (Kong et al.,
1999). But this process is more complex as it needs some proteins such as nuclear factor kappa B
(NF-kB), receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK), RANKL and osteoprotegerin (OPG),
among others, which may change the answer of the osteoclast precursors and therefore modify the
osseous destruction.
Nowadays, antibiotics are used as complementary elements but its use should be restricted to the
minimum due to the frequent development of resistances, and to the difficulty of maintaining
stable and effective levels during a long period of time (Socransky & Haffajee, 2002). For
this reason it becomes necessary the additional research of substances or techniques that can
modify the pH, the oxygen concentration or the nutrient disposition of the dental plaque in
order to modify the microflora of the biofilm. We also need to find systems able to interfere
with the bacterial genetic signals and to modify the inflammatory response in the periodontal
tissues.
2. Lasers employed in periodontics
Currently, different equipments of laser radiation (
medical
fibers,
surgical fibers,
medical fiber
optics,
laser fibers), are available in Periodontics, each one with
particular features and diverse effects, making necessary the selection of the most suitable for
each type of application (Table 1). Some of these lasers are effective in eliminating the
residual calculus and detoxifying the radicular cementum (Er:YAG) (Aoki et al., 2004; Ishikawa
et al., 2004; Schwarz et al., 2008); on the contrary others are unable to eliminate the calculus
but can act over the soft tissues reducing the inflammation, as they modify the tissue oxidation
systems and the cytokines which mediate in inflammation (Nd:YAG, diode) (Gómez et al.,
2011). Although these effects over the tissues are difficult to evaluate clinically, they are
guaranteed by molecular biology techniques. The results seem to be variable, but the
investigation should help us to select the wavelength of the radiation, pulse duration,
energy/power applied, pulse shape, repetition rate, time of exposure, sequence, type of wave,
continuous (cw) or pulsed, type of applicator (cutout or rigid fiberglass), and other factors
which can provide the desired objectives.
The therapeutic application of laser radiation can be clinically useful only if the appropriate
instrumentation is available. Since the laser has been introduced into medicine, and so into
dental discipline, a number of different applicators have been developed for day-to-day clinical
use. The types of applicators most used in Periodontics are shown next. For instance, those with
rigid fiberglass are set over handpieces. They should be used sliding them almost parallel to
the radicular surface (Fig. 2), with a 20º angle in a coronoapical sense, as the
perpendicular application produces damage in the cementum. Due to their size, the applicators
with cutout fiberglass (Fig. 3) allow intrasulcular insertion and can reach deep areas. The
displacement is also done in a coronoapical sense, outlining the whole radicular surface
following the depth of the periodontal pockets, in the same manner as in a periodontal probing.
Other rigid and thin applicators should be used with spiral or circular movements instead of
coronoapically, in order to optimize results.
In Periodontics we need treatments to eliminate the plaque and calculus, and to eliminate and/or
reduce the gingival inflammatory phenomena. We have to operate therefore over the soft and hard
dental tissues. For this reason, the basic effects of periodontal lasers over these soft and
hard tissues are presented next, in order to show the possibilities of this technology applied
alone, and mainly in combination with SRP.
3. Lasers on dental soft tissues
The earliest clinical studies mentioning the application of lasers in the non-surgical treatment
of periodontitis began in the early 1990s using a Nd:YAG laser with the development of flexible
optical fibres. Since then, many studies have been carried out to evaluate the possible
advantages of the use of lasers (Nd:YAG, diode (GaAlAs, InGaAsP), Er:YAG, Er,Cr:YSGG and CO2)
with wavelengths ranging from 635 to 10,600 nm. Recently, systematic reviews have compiled
different clinical and microbiological effects of different types of laser radiation used as
monotherapy or adjunctive therapy compared with SRP. However, less information to demonstrate
the anti-inflammatory effect of the laser radiation is available from the literature.
3.1 Nd:YAG laser radiation
Unlike other infrared lasers with a strong absorption by water, such as Er:YAG or CO 2, the
wavelength of Nd:YAG laser presents a poor absorption by water, thus increasing scattering and
infiltration of its energy into the biological tissues. The photothermal effects of Nd:YAG laser
are useful in soft tissue surgeries. Thanks to its great penetration depth and thermogenesis
properties, this type of laser produces a thick coagulation layer in the irradiated area,
presenting a great haemostatic capacity, being efficient for the ablation of potentially
haemorrhagic soft tissues (Perry et al., 1997, Romanos, 1994). There is little evidence to
support the efficacy of Nd:YAG laser treatment as an adjunct to nonsurgical periodontal
treatment in adults with periodontal inflammation. In the last decade, there are barely clinical
studies published analyzing the clinical evolution and the inflammatory mediator levels in the
gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) after irradiation with Nd:YAG laser in the affected sites in
patients with chronic periodontitis. The results obtained in four clinical studies, performed by
three different research groups, should be emphasized (Gómez et al., 2011; Miyazaki et
al., 2003; Qadri et al., 2010, 2011). The overheating of the irradiated tissues and the
consequent damage of the oral hard and soft tissues, could explain the limited support to this
kind of laser radiation from the scientific community (Miserendino et al., 1994). For this
reason, to avoid thermal damage, the irradiation parameters employed in these clinical studies
were selected according to the results obtained in previous in vitro investigations, where
potential morphological alterations of root surface irradiation were assessed under standardized
conditions (Bader, 2000; Gómez et al., 2009). Concerning the evolution of the clinical
parameters, the application of Nd:YAG laser both as monotherapy or as an adjuvant to scaling and
root planing, did not offer significant advantages versus the treatment with ultrasonic devices,
both at 8 (Gómez et al., 2011) (Fig. 4) and at 12 weeks (Miyazaki et al., 2003).
Nevertheless, Qadri et al., in their split mouth trial, found better clinical results in the
test side (SRP + Nd:YAG) than in the control side (SRP) during the long term follow up (up to 20
months) (Qadri et al., 2011). When analyzing the inflammatory mediators, Miyazaki, in a 12 weeks
study, found a non statistically significant decrease of IL-1┚ in Nd:YAG group used as
monotherapy in comparison with ultrasonic devices for the non surgical treatment of chronic
periodontitis (Miyazaki et al., 2003). On the contrary, Gómez did find in a short term
study (4 and 8 weeks) significant decreases both in IL-1┚ as in TNF-┙ when using Nd:YAG as an
adjuvant to SRP versus SRP alone (Fig. 5). In this same study, the total antioxidant status
(TAS) of the gingival fluid, gradually increased until the eighth week after the treatment with
SRP + Nd:YAG, while it remained stable when the treatment consisted of SRP, being these
differences statistically significant (Gómez et al., 2011). The total antioxidant
capacity of the gingival fluid decreases in periodontitis as a consequence of the inflammatory
lesion, and it recovers after non surgical therapy (Brock et al., 2004; Chapple et al., 2007;
Tsai et al., 2005).